So you want to answer the Call for Papers? It offers recommendations for the content and presentation for the abstract, as well as examples of the very best abstracts submitted to your 2012-2013 abstract selection committee when it comes to ninth annual new york State University graduate student history conference.
Typically, an abstract describes this issue you want to present in the conference, highlighting your argument, evidence and contribution into the historical literature. Most commonly it is limited to 250-500 words. The term limit could be challenging: some graduate students try not to fret throughout the limit that is short hastily write and submit an abstract at the last second, which regularly hurts their chances of being accepted; other students try to condense the Next Great American Novel into 250 words, which is often equally damning. Graduate students who approach the abstract early, plan accordingly, and carefully edit are those most frequently invited to present their research. If you are intimidated by the project, don’t be – the abstract is a form that is fairly standardized of. Proceed with the guidelines that are basic and avoid common pitfalls and you may greatly improve your abstract.
Diligently follow all abstract style and formatting guidelines. Most CFPs will specify page or word length, as well as perhaps some layout or style guidelines. Some CFPs, however, will list very specific restrictions, including font, font size, spacing, text justification, margins, just how to present quotes, just how to present authors and works, whether or not to include footnotes or not. Be sure that you strictly stay glued to all guidelines, including submission instructions. If a CFP will not provide style that is abstract formatting guidelines, it is generally appropriate to stay around 250 words – abstract committees read many of these things and don’t look fondly on comparatively long abstracts. Make sure that you orient your topic that is abstract to any specific CFP themes, time periods, methods, and/or buzzwords.
With a 250-500 word limit, write only what is necessary, avoiding wordiness. Use active voice and focus on excessive phrasing that is prepositional.
Plan your abstract carefully before writing it. A abstract that is good address the next questions: What is the historical question or problem? Contextualize your topic. What exactly is your thesis/argument? It should be original. What is your evidence? State forthrightly you are using source material that is primary. How exactly does your paper squeeze into the historiography? What’s going on in neuro-scientific study and exactly how does your paper donate to it? Why does it matter? We know the subject is important to you, why should it is vital that you the selection committee that is abstract?
You ought to be as specific as you possibly can, avoiding overly broad or statements that are overreaching claims. And that is it: don’t get sidetracked by writing narrative that is too much over explaining. Say what you should say and nothing more.
Keep your audience at heart. How background that is much give on a subject is determined by the conference. May be the conference an over-all humanities conference, a general graduate student history conference, or something more specific like a 1960s social revolutions conference? Your pitch must certanly be worthy of the specificity regarding the conference: the more specific the subject, the less background that is broad have to give and vice versa.
Revise and edit your abstract to ensure its presentation that is final is free. The editing phase is also the best time to see your abstract as a whole and chip away at unnecessary words or phrases. The final draft should be linear and clear and it also should read smoothly. If you should be tripping over something while reading, the abstract selection committee will as well. Ask another graduate student to see your abstract to ensure its clarity or attend a Graduate Student Writing Group meeting.
Your language should really be professional and your style should stick to standards that are academic. Contractions might be appealing because of the expressed word limits, nevertheless they should always be avoided. If citation guidelines are not specifically given, it really is appropriate to use the name that is author’s title of work (in either italics or quotation marks) inside the text as opposed to use footnotes or in-text citations.
While one question, if really good, might be posed in your abstract, you ought to avoid writing more than one (maybe two, if really really good). If you do pose a question or two, ensure that you either answer it or essaywriter address why the question matters to your conference paper – unless you’re posing an obvious rhetorical question, you must never just let a question hang there. A lot of questions uses up a lot of space and leaves less room so that you can build your argument, methods, evidence, historiography, etc. Often times, posing a lot of questions leaves the abstract committee wondering if you are going to address one or all in your paper if you even comprehend the answers to them. Remember, you’re not likely to have previously written your conference paper, however you are required to have done enough research that you are ready to write on a particular topic you could adequately cover in 15-20 minutes. Prove that you have inked so.
Language that can help you be as specific as possible in presenting your argument is excellent but don’t get your readers bogged down in jargon. They’ll certainly be reading plenty of abstracts and will not like to wade through the language that is unnecessary. Ensure that it it is simple.
When students repeat claims, they often don’t realize they are doing so. Sometimes this occurs because students are not yet clear on their argument. Consider it even more and then write. In other cases, students write carelessly and don’t proofread. Make certain each sentence is unique and therefore it plays a role in the flow of your abstract.
The abstract committee does not need to be reminded associated with the grand sweep of history so that you can contextualize your topic. Place your topic specifically in the historiography.
The samples below represent the five scoring samples that are highest submitted to the selection committee for the ninth annual graduate student history conference, 2012-2013. Two for the samples below were subsequently selected for publication in the NC State Graduate Journal of History. Outstanding papers presented in the graduate student history conference are suitable for publication by panel commentators. Papers go through a review that is peer before publication.